MARYLAND — The Chesapeake Bay Crossing Study releases its finding on the best way to relief congestion at the Chesapeake Bay Bridge.
The federal environmental process is taking to the public four preliminary alternatives, including three preliminary corridors and a no-build alternative.
“While the No-Build alternative and three preliminary corridor alternatives are being included in the federal environmental process for further study, traffic models indicate that one of the three, building a third crossing within the same corridor as the existing Bay Bridge (Corridor 7), would have the most positive impact on reducing traffic,” said MDTA Executive Director Jim Ports.
The Bay Crossing Study Tier 1 is retaining the No-Build alternative and these Preliminary Corridor Alternatives Retained for Analysis (CARA):
- Corridor 6: MD 100 to US 301 between Pasadena (Anne Arundel County), Rock Hall (Kent County) and Centreville (Queen Anne’s County);
- Corridor 7: existing Bay Bridge corridor, US 50/301 to US 50 between Crofton (Anne Arundel County) and Queenstown (Queen Anne’s County); and
- Corridor 8: US 50/301 between Crofton (Anne Arundel County) and Easton (Talbot County).
Data indicates that each of the three corridor alternatives could have a positive impact on traffic. Corridor 7, the corridor where the existing Bay Bridge is today, provides the most congestion relief. This corridor best relieves congestion at the existing Bay Bridge on both non-summer weekdays and summer weekends compared to all other corridors.
Corridor 7 would best reduce backups at the existing Bay Bridge, provide the greatest reduction in the duration of unacceptable congestion levels, and is more compatible with existing land-use patterns, according to the study data.
The purpose of the Bay Crossing Study is to consider potential alternatives to provide expanded traffic capacity and additional access across the Chesapeake Bay to improve mobility, travel reliability and safety at the existing Bay Bridge, while considering financial viability and environmental responsibility.
The study also looks at modal and operational transportation methods including ferry service, bus rapid transit, rail transit and transportation systems management/travel demand management.
At the open houses, the MDTA will provide information and receive feedback on the range of alternatives and the Preliminary CARA. Attendees also will learn about the purpose and need aspect of the study, traffic, engineering and environmental considerations, comments received to date, next steps and how to stay informed. For more information on the four preliminary alternatives, visitbaycrossingstudy.com to review the public open house display boards. Here are the planned open houses:
Tuesday, Sept. 24 (6-8 p.m.)
Kent County High School
25301 Lambs Meadow Rd.
Worton, MD 21678
Wednesday, Sept. 25 (6-8 p.m.)
Queen Anne’s County High School
125 Ruthsburg Rd.
Centreville, MD 21617
Thursday, Sept. 26 (6-8 p.m.)
Calvert High School
600 Dares Beach Rd.
Prince Frederick, MD 20678
Tuesday, Oct. 1 (6-8 p.m.)
Middle River Middle School
800 Middle River Rd.
Middle River, MD 21220
Wednesday, Oct. 2 (6-8 p.m.)
Anne Arundel Community College
101 College Pkwy.
Arnold, MD 21012
Thursday, Oct. 3 (6-8 p.m.)
Talbot County Community Center
10028 Ocean Gateway
Easton, MD 21601
Funded by toll dollars, the Bay Crossing Study Tier 1 began in 2016 and is expected to be complete in 2021. The next steps are to publish a Draft Environmental Impact Statement and hold public hearings in fall 2020. The final steps are to identify the preferred corridor alternative and publish the Final Environmental Impact Statement/Record of Decision in collaboration with FHWA in summer 2021.
